首页> 外文OA文献 >'Who's actually gonna read this?' An evaluation of staff experiences of the value of information contained in written care plans in supporting care in three different dementia care settings
【2h】

'Who's actually gonna read this?' An evaluation of staff experiences of the value of information contained in written care plans in supporting care in three different dementia care settings

机译:“实际上谁会读这本书?”对员工体验的书面护理计划中的信息在三种不同的痴呆护理环境中支持护理的价值进行评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Reports of increased healthcare bureaucracy and concerns over care plan quality have emerged from research and surveys into staff and service user experiences. Little is known of mental health staff perspectives on the value of written care plans in supporting dementia care.\ud\udAIM: To investigate the experiences and views of staff in relation to care planning in dementia services in one National Health Service (NHS) provider Trust in England.\ud\udMETHOD: Grounded Theory methodology was used. A purposive sample of 11 multidisciplinary staff were interviewed across three sites in one NHS Trust. Interviews were transcribed, coded and analysed using the constant comparative method.\ud\udFINDINGS: Five themes were identified and are explored in detail below: 1) Repetition; 2) the impact of electronic records on practice; 3) ambivalence about the value of paperwork; 4) time conflicts; and 5) alternative sources of information to plan care.\ud\udDISCUSSION: Participants perceived that written care plans did not help staff with good practice in planning care or to support dementia care generally. Staff were frustrated by repetitive documentation, inflexible electronic records and conflicting demands on their time.\ud\udIMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Frontline staff should be involved in designing new information systems including care plans. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
机译:背景:关于员工和服务使用者体验的研究和调查已经出现了有关医疗保健官僚机构增加和对护理计划质量的担忧的报告。目的:在一家国家卫生服务(NHS)提供商中,调查精神保健人员对书面护理计划在支持痴呆症治疗中的价值的了解很少。\ ud \ ud目标:调查员工在痴呆症服务中与护理计划有关的经验和观点方法:使用扎根理论方法。在一个NHS信托的三个地点对11位多学科工作人员进行了有目的的抽样访谈。访谈采用连续比较法进行记录,编码和分析。\ ud \ udFINDINGS:确定了五个主题,并在下面进行了详细探讨:1)重复; 2)电子记录对实践的影响; 3)关于文书工作价值的模棱两可; 4)时间冲突; 5)计划护理的替代信息来源。\ ud \ ud讨论:参与者认为书面护理计划无助于在计划护理或总体上支持痴呆症护理方面具有良好实践的员工。工作人员对重复的文档,不灵活的电子记录以及对时间的矛盾要求而感到沮丧。\ ud \ ud实践:一线工作人员应参与设计包括护理计划在内的新信息系统。本文受版权保护。版权所有。

著录项

  • 作者

    Drummond, C.; Simpson, A.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号